Friends,
I got this response from Jubelirer’s office, one of our local representatives here in PA. Looks like one way out of this is to somehow get significantly more people to ride Amtrak in the New York to Chicago run. So, ride ride ride !!!
Tom Hesley
—–Original Message—–
From: Luckenbill, Emily [mailto:eluckenbill@pasen.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 3:43 PM
To: pulse@prosaic-expressions.com
Subject: RE: Please Support Continued Amtrak Funding
Dear Mr. Hesley:
Thank you for sharing your concern about Amtrak’s decision to reduce train service to Altoona.
I have heard from several other people whose travel has been affected by Amtrak’s recent announcement to eliminate one of the two trains serving our area. Amtrak cited pressure brought on by reduced federal subsidies as a reason to lower costs by eliminating some less-traveled routes.
Prior to the change in service, PennDOT did investigate making up the shortfall in federal subsidy. However, PennDOT found that despite an increase in ridership in the last year, $2.5 million or nearly $167 for each of the 15,000 riders would be required to keep the service in effect. By comparison, the PennDOT subsidy on other runs is roughly $15 per passenger.
The high subsidies are hard to justify when there is such strong competition for transportation dollars.
Clearly, increasing the number of riders would bring down the needed government subsidy. One of the significant challenges to building ridership is developing reliable and timely rail service. However, because Norfolk Southern owns the track that Amtrak runs on, there are conflicts between freight and passenger service.
In order to get a better understanding of what it would take to improve track conditions, to reduce travel times, and get a closer look at freight and passenger conflicts, Norfolk Southern, Amtrak, and the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation are cooperating in a study of the corridor. The study, which I pushed for, is nearing completion.
We understand that there are people who depend on rail service. Although no one wants to see reduction in service, the subsidy levels to sustain operations were difficult to defend. Efforts are continuing to look at ways to build ridership and reduce the level of government funding needed to sustain operations.
I trust this information is helpful. Should you have further questions about this or any other matter, please do not hesitate to contact my office.
Sincerely,
ROBERT C. JUBELIRER
SENATOR, 30TH DISTRICT
RCJ/jel
Emily J. Luckenbill
Secretary to Senator Robert C. Jubelirer
292 Main Capitol Building
717.787.5490
eluckenbill@pasen.gov
—–Original Message—–
From: Thomas J. Hesley [mailto:pulse@prosaic-expressions.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 9:51 PM
To: Jubelirer, Robert
Subject: Please Support Continued Amtrak Funding
Mr. Jubelirer:
I am a vision-impaired man, living in Altoona, PA. I do not see well enough to drive a car, and so, I rely heavily on Amtrak trains to transport me to Pittsburgh and Philadelphia to see friends and conduct business. The recent loss of Amtrak’s “Three Rivers” route impacts me as well as some fifteen blind folks living in PA that I know personally.
I urge you to ensure that full Amtrak funding for the next fiscal year is maintained, not cut. I believe as a nation, we have a duty to preserving our inter-city transportation infrastructure, though it might not be profitable on paper. My friends and me need the American rail system to be expanded, not reduced. Please do what you can to bring this to fruition.
Thanks,
Tom Hesley – Prosaic Expressions